Gonzales v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gonzales v. State

554 So. 2d 1215, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 38, 1990 WL 735

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 5, 1990

DocketNo. 87-02828

StatusPublished

This text of 554 So. 2d 1215 (Gonzales v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gonzales v. State, 554 So. 2d 1215, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 38, 1990 WL 735 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Gonzales was assessed attorney’s fees by an order supplemental to his judgment and sentence, even though the trial judge did not address attorney’s fees at sentencing. We reverse this imposition of attorney’s fees which did not give appellant opportunity to be heard as to amount. See Henri-quez v. State, 545 So.2d 1340 (Fla.1989). We find no merit in appellant’s other sentencing point. Thus we otherwise affirm.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Gonzales was assessed attorney’s fees by an order supplemental to his judgment and sentence, even though the trial judge did not address attorney’s fees at sentencing. We reverse this imposition of attorney’s fees which did not give appellant opportunity to be heard as to amount. See Henri-quez v. State, 545 So.2d 1340 (Fla.1989). We find no merit in appellant’s other sentencing point. Thus we otherwise affirm.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

554 So. 2d 1215, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 38, 1990 WL 735, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gonzales-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack