Gonzales v. Shop Smart Grocery

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gonzales v. Shop Smart Grocery

202 A.D.2d 633, 610 N.Y.S.2d 838

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 28, 1994·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant landlord, Mamie Lee, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dunkin, J.) dated July 10, 1992, which denied her motion for summary judg[634] ment dismissing the complaint and the cross claims as against her.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

Triable issues of fact exist with regard to the out-of-possession landlord’s liability for the plaintiffs injuries (see, Guzman v Haven Plaza Hous. Dev. Fund Co., 69 NY2d 559, 565; Administrative Code of City of NY § 27-128). Mangano, P. J., Balletta, O’Brien, Hart and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant landlord, Mamie Lee, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dunkin, J.) dated July 10, 1992, which denied her motion for summary judg[634] ment dismissing the complaint and the cross claims as against her.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

Triable issues of fact exist with regard to the out-of-possession landlord’s liability for the plaintiffs injuries (see, Guzman v Haven Plaza Hous. Dev. Fund Co., 69 NY2d 559, 565; Administrative Code of City of NY § 27-128). Mangano, P. J., Balletta, O’Brien, Hart and Florio, JJ., concur.

Gonzales v. Shop Smart Grocery, 202 A.D.2d 633, 610 N.Y.S.2d 838 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

202 A.D.2d 633 (Gonzales v. Shop Smart Grocery) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related