Gonzales v. Schumacher

Missouri Court of Appeals

Gonzales v. Schumacher

195 S.W.3d 10, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1807, 2005 WL 3291226

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 6, 2005

DocketED 86254

StatusPublished

This text of 195 S.W.3d 10 (Gonzales v. Schumacher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gonzales v. Schumacher, 195 S.W.3d 10, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1807, 2005 WL 3291226 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Mary Gonzales appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County granting Respondent Nancy Schu-macher’s motion to dismiss Ms. Gonzales’s petition in equity for specific performance. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find the trial court properly dismissed Ms. Gonzales’s petition.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

*11 The trial court’s judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(5).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Mary Gonzales appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County granting Respondent Nancy Schu-macher’s motion to dismiss Ms. Gonzales’s petition in equity for specific performance. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find the trial court properly dismissed Ms. Gonzales’s petition.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

*11 The trial court’s judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(5).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

195 S.W.3d 10, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1807, 2005 WL 3291226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gonzales-v-schumacher-moctapp-2005.