Gonzales v. Los Serranos Company

California Court of Appeal

Gonzales v. Los Serranos Company

17 P.2d 1038, 128 Cal. App. 780

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedDecember 23, 1932

DocketDocket No. 193.

StatusPublished

This text of 17 P.2d 1038 (Gonzales v. Los Serranos Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gonzales v. Los Serranos Company, 17 P.2d 1038, 128 Cal. App. 780 (Cal. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

BARNARD, P. J.

Except for the name of the plaintiff

and claimant, a difference in certain dates and amounts, the essential facts of this case are almost identical with those in the case of Shafer v. Los Serranos Co. & United States National Bank of Los Angeles, (Civil No. 192) ante, p. 357 [17 Pac. (2d) 1036], this day decided. One difference is that in this case the notice of claim of lien states that the contractors, Hartley & Camp Construction Company, engaged with the United States National Bank of Los Angeles to erect a building on the property described. However, the complaint alleges that the plaintiff furnished the materials, for the value of which a lien is claimed, to the Los Serranos Company, nothing being alleged in the complaint to in any manner indicate any connection of the Los Serranos Company with the property or the owner thereof. In all other respects the facts and findings in the two cases are essentially the same.

Upon the authority of Shafer v. Los Serranos Co. & United States National Bank of Los Angeles, and for the reasons therein set forth, the judgment herein appealed from is affirmed.

Marks, J., and Jennings, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BARNARD, P. J.

Except for the name of the plaintiff

and claimant, a difference in certain dates and amounts, the essential facts of this case are almost identical with those in the case of Shafer v. Los Serranos Co. & United States National Bank of Los Angeles, (Civil No. 192) ante, p. 357 [17 Pac. (2d) 1036], this day decided. One difference is that in this case the notice of claim of lien states that the contractors, Hartley & Camp Construction Company, engaged with the United States National Bank of Los Angeles to erect a building on the property described. However, the complaint alleges that the plaintiff furnished the materials, for the value of which a lien is claimed, to the Los Serranos Company, nothing being alleged in the complaint to in any manner indicate any connection of the Los Serranos Company with the property or the owner thereof. In all other respects the facts and findings in the two cases are essentially the same.

Upon the authority of Shafer v. Los Serranos Co. & United States National Bank of Los Angeles, and for the reasons therein set forth, the judgment herein appealed from is affirmed.

Marks, J., and Jennings, J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 P.2d 1038, 128 Cal. App. 780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gonzales-v-los-serranos-company-calctapp-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack