Gonzales v. Lewis & Clark Marine, Inc.

247 S.W.3d 17, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 246, 2008 WL 426256
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 19, 2008·No. ED 89680·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

American Commercial Terminals, LLC (ACT) appeals from the trial court’s grant of Lewis & Clark Marine, Ine.’s (Lewis & Clark) motion for summary judgment and denial of ACT’s motion for partial summary judgment. Lewis & Clark cross-appeals from the trial court’s denial of its second motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that Lewis & Clark was entitled to judgment as a matter of law, and its cross-appeal is moot. ACT’s appeal of the trial court’s denial of its motion for partial summary judgment is also dismissed as moot. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gonzales v. Lewis & Clark Marine, Inc., 247 S.W.3d 17, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 246, 2008 WL 426256 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

247 S.W.3d 17 (Gonzales v. Lewis & Clark Marine, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. Missouri Department of Fire Safety
247 S.W.3d 17 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)