Gonzales v. Lewis & Clark Marine, Inc.

247 S.W.3d 17, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 246, 2008 WL 426256
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 19, 2008
DocketED 89680
StatusPublished

This text of 247 S.W.3d 17 (Gonzales v. Lewis & Clark Marine, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gonzales v. Lewis & Clark Marine, Inc., 247 S.W.3d 17, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 246, 2008 WL 426256 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

American Commercial Terminals, LLC (ACT) appeals from the trial court’s grant of Lewis & Clark Marine, Ine.’s (Lewis & Clark) motion for summary judgment and denial of ACT’s motion for partial summary judgment. Lewis & Clark cross-appeals from the trial court’s denial of its second motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that Lewis & Clark was entitled to judgment as a matter of law, and its cross-appeal is moot. ACT’s appeal of the trial court’s denial of its motion for partial summary judgment is also dismissed as moot. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. Missouri Department of Fire Safety
247 S.W.3d 17 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
247 S.W.3d 17, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 246, 2008 WL 426256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gonzales-v-lewis-clark-marine-inc-moctapp-2008.