Gonzales, Jimmy AKA Gonzalex, Jimmy Jr.
This text of Gonzales, Jimmy AKA Gonzalex, Jimmy Jr. (Gonzales, Jimmy AKA Gonzalex, Jimmy Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-93,720-01
EX PARTE JIMMY GONZALES, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 20681-A IN THE 23RD DISTRICT COURT FROM WHARTON COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Applicant was convicted of continuous sexual abuse of a child and sentenced to twenty-five
years’ imprisonment. The Thirteenth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Gonzales v. State,
No. 13-18-00193-CR (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi-Edinburgh Nov. 29, 2018)(not designated for
publication). Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction,
and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
Applicant contends that trial counsel was ineffective for, among other things, failing to
properly explain a plea offer. He contends that his appellate counsel was ineffective for, among
other things, failing to timely inform him of the appellate court’s decision and of his right to file a
pro se petition for discretionary review. 2
Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,
466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997); Ex parte Crow, 180
S.W.3d 135 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court
is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial
court shall order both trial and appellate counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims. In developing the
record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to
hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants
to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing.
See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall
immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether trial counsel’s
performance was deficient and Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court shall make findings of fact
and conclusions of law as to whether appellate counsel timely advised Applicant that had a right to
file a pro se petition for discretionary review. The trial court shall also determine whether Applicant
would have timely filed a petition for discretionary review but for appellate counsel’s alleged
deficient performance. The trial court may make any other findings and conclusions that it deems
appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from
the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,
affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from
hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested 3
by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
Filed: May 11, 2022 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gonzales, Jimmy AKA Gonzalex, Jimmy Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gonzales-jimmy-aka-gonzalex-jimmy-jr-texcrimapp-2022.