Gonsior v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.

31 N.W. 515, 36 Minn. 385, 1887 Minn. LEXIS 231
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided February 2, 1887·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

Gileillan, C. J.

The action was properly dismissed. Assuming that it was negligence on the part of the foreman at the round-house to order plaintiff to do the particular thing in which he was hurt, it was the negligence of a fellow-servant. There was no evidence of a failure on the part of defendant to furnish, for the use of its servants at the round-house, all proper and necessary instruments to do the work as safely as it can be done, nor that the foreman was not a skilful and competent man. The case is directly within the decision in [386] Brown v. Winona & St. Peter R. Co., 27 Minn. 162, (6 N. W. Rep. 484.)

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gonsior v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co., 31 N.W. 515, 36 Minn. 385, 1887 Minn. LEXIS 231 (Mich. 1887).

31 N.W. 515 (Gonsior v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pasco v. Minneapolis Steed & Machinery Co.
117 N.W. 479 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1908)
Blomquist v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.
62 N.W. 818 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1895)
Corneilson v. Eastern Railway Co.
52 N.W. 224 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1892)
Lindvall v. Woods
4 L.R.A. 793 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1889)