Gonsior v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.
This text of 31 N.W. 515 (Gonsior v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The action was properly dismissed. Assuming that it was negligence on the part of the foreman at the round-house to order plaintiff to do the particular thing in which he was hurt, it was the negligence of a fellow-servant. There was no evidence of a failure on the part of defendant to furnish, for the use of its servants at the round-house, all proper and necessary instruments to do the work as safely as it can be done, nor that the foreman was not a skilful and competent man. The case is directly within the decision in [386]*386Brown v. Winona & St. Peter R. Co., 27 Minn. 162, (6 N. W. Rep. 484.)
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
31 N.W. 515, 36 Minn. 385, 1887 Minn. LEXIS 231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gonsior-v-minneapolis-st-louis-railway-co-minn-1887.