Gonsalves v. Holma
This text of Gonsalves v. Holma (Gonsalves v. Holma) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 07-DEC-2023 08:02 AM Dkt. 22 OGP
SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI ________________________________________________________________
CELESTE M. GONSALVES, Petitioner,
vs.
THE HONORABLE KARIN L. HOLMA, Judge of the District Court of the First Circuit, State of Hawaiʻi, Respondent Judge,
and
JEAN M. ORQUE, Respondent. ________________________________________________________________
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (1DSC-XX-XXXXXXX)
ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, and Eddins, JJ., Circuit Judge Kawano and Circuit Judge Kawashima, assigned by reason of vacancies)
Upon consideration of the petition, Respondent’s answer to
the petition, Petitioner’s reply, and the record, this court is
satisfied that Petitioner has met the service required by Hawaiʻi
Revised Statutes § 633-28(a)(2) (2016) and Rules of the Small
Claims Division of the District Courts (RSCD) Rule 3(c). See RSCD Rule 1 (stating that the RSCD shall be construed to secure
the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every
action); RSCD Rule 9 (“The court shall not be bound by rules of
evidence except provisions relating to privileged
communications.”); see also Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawaiʻi 200, 204,
982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (mandamus standard).
The evidence reflects that someone signed the certified
mail receipt as the addressee within the first judicial circuit
and Respondent has been appearing for the hearings, including
the first hearing on June 30, 2023.
It is ordered that the petition is granted and a writ shall
issue requiring the Respondent Judge, or any presiding judge of
the Small Claims Division of the District Court of the First
Circuit, to move 1DSC-XX-XXXXXXX beyond the service issue,
including setting for trial if necessary.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, December 7, 2023.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
/s/ Kelsey T. Kawano
/s/ James S. Kawashima
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gonsalves v. Holma, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gonsalves-v-holma-haw-2023.