Gonnie Griner v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gonnie Griner v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 29, 2021

Docket20-2432

StatusPublished

This text of Gonnie Griner v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections (Gonnie Griner v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gonnie Griner v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, (Fla. Ct. App. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D20-2432 _____________________________

GONNIE GRINER,

Appellant,

v.

MARK S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections,

Appellee. _____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Union County. Denise Rae Ferrero, Judge.

September 29, 2021

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Fla. R. of Crim. P. 3.850(a)(2)–(3) (providing that a defendant alleging that a trial court lacked jurisdiction to enter the judgment or impose sentence may raise the claim by postconviction motion); Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236, 1242 (Fla. 2004) (explaining that “[t]he remedy of habeas corpus is not available in Florida to obtain the kind of collateral postconviction relief available by motion in the sentencing court pursuant to rule 3.850”); Zuluaga v Dep’t of Corr., 32 So. 3d 674, 677 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (explaining that a circuit court lacks jurisdiction to review the legality of a conviction entered in another judicial circuit). This appeal is frivolous. Appellant has filed four other cases in this Court, following his 1994 and 1997 convictions entered in Martin County. Appellant is warned that any future filings that this Court determines to be frivolous or malicious may result in the imposition of sanctions, including a prohibition against any further pro se filings in this Court and a referral to the appropriate institution for disciplinary procedures. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2020) (providing that “[a] prisoner who is found by a court to have brought a frivolous or malicious suit, action, claim, proceeding, or appeal . . . is subject to disciplinary procedures pursuant to the rules of the Department of Corrections”).

ROWE, C.J., and LEWIS and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Gonnie Griner, pro se, Appellant.

David M. Mabry, Senior Attorney, and Daniel Burke, Assistant General Counsel, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D20-2432 _____________________________

GONNIE GRINER,

Appellant,

v.

MARK S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections,

Appellee. _____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Union County. Denise Rae Ferrero, Judge.

September 29, 2021

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Fla. R. of Crim. P. 3.850(a)(2)–(3) (providing that a defendant alleging that a trial court lacked jurisdiction to enter the judgment or impose sentence may raise the claim by postconviction motion); Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236, 1242 (Fla. 2004) (explaining that “[t]he remedy of habeas corpus is not available in Florida to obtain the kind of collateral postconviction relief available by motion in the sentencing court pursuant to rule 3.850”); Zuluaga v Dep’t of Corr., 32 So. 3d 674, 677 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (explaining that a circuit court lacks jurisdiction to review the legality of a conviction entered in another judicial circuit). This appeal is frivolous. Appellant has filed four other cases in this Court, following his 1994 and 1997 convictions entered in Martin County. Appellant is warned that any future filings that this Court determines to be frivolous or malicious may result in the imposition of sanctions, including a prohibition against any further pro se filings in this Court and a referral to the appropriate institution for disciplinary procedures. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2020) (providing that “[a] prisoner who is found by a court to have brought a frivolous or malicious suit, action, claim, proceeding, or appeal . . . is subject to disciplinary procedures pursuant to the rules of the Department of Corrections”).

ROWE, C.J., and LEWIS and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Gonnie Griner, pro se, Appellant.

David M. Mabry, Senior Attorney, and Daniel Burke, Assistant General Counsel, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Gonnie Griner v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gonnie-griner-v-mark-s-inch-secretary-florida-department-of-corrections-fladistctapp-2021.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack