Gonnelli v. State

222 So. 3d 1234, 2017 WL 3091214, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 10491
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 21, 2017·No. Case No. 5D16-3177·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm this Anders1 appeal but remand to correct a scrivener’s error in the judgment. The trial court orally pronounced that it found Gonnelli qualified as a violent career criminal and sentenced him accordingly; however, the written judgment and sentence reflects that Gon-nelli was sentenced as a habitual violent felony offender. On remand, the judgment [1235]*1235should be corrected to reflect that Gonnelli was sentenced as a violent career criminal.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

EVANDER, BERGER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gonnelli v. State, 222 So. 3d 1234, 2017 WL 3091214, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 10491 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

222 So. 3d 1234 (Gonnelli v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)