Gonkjur Associates v. Abrams

New York Court of Appeals

Gonkjur Associates v. Abrams

447 N.E.2d 76, 58 N.Y.2d 878, 460 N.Y.S.2d 528, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 2861

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 10, 1983

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 447 N.E.2d 76 (Gonkjur Associates v. Abrams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gonkjur Associates v. Abrams, 447 N.E.2d 76, 58 N.Y.2d 878, 460 N.Y.S.2d 528, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 2861 (N.Y. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (88 AD2d 854; see, also, Matter of Gonkjur Assoc. v Abrams, 57 NY2d 853; and Matter of Edge Ho Holding Corp., 256 NY 374, 381-382).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg, Meyer and Simons.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (88 AD2d 854; see, also, Matter of Gonkjur Assoc. v Abrams, 57 NY2d 853; and Matter of Edge Ho Holding Corp., 256 NY 374, 381-382).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg, Meyer and Simons.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

447 N.E.2d 76, 58 N.Y.2d 878, 460 N.Y.S.2d 528, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 2861, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gonkjur-associates-v-abrams-ny-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack