Gonkjur Associates v. Abrams
447 N.E.2d 76, 58 N.Y.2d 878, 460 N.Y.S.2d 528, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 2861
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (88 AD2d 854; see, also, Matter of Gonkjur Assoc. v Abrams, 57 NY2d 853; and Matter of Edge Ho Holding Corp., 256 NY 374, 381-382).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg, Meyer and Simons.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gonkjur Associates v. Abrams, 447 N.E.2d 76, 58 N.Y.2d 878, 460 N.Y.S.2d 528, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 2861 (N.Y. 1983).
447 N.E.2d 76 (Gonkjur Associates v. Abrams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Centennial Restorations Co. v. Abrams
180 A.D.2d 340 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)