Gong v. Sarnoff
This text of Gong v. Sarnoff (Gong v. Sarnoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: monn nrc nanan KK DATE FILED:_ 3/22/2024 JUNWU GONG, : Plaintiff, : : 23-cv-343 (LJL) -V- : : ORDER STUART M. SARNOFF, et al., : Defendants. : wee KX LEWIS J. LIMAN, United States District Judge: Defendants O’Melveny and Myers and Stuart Sarnoff have moved for attorneys’ fees. While Defendants have submitted time sheets to support their motion, the time sheets lack specific descriptions of the work done and thus the Court is not able to determine whether the hours were reasonable. See, e.g., N.Y. Ass’n for Retarded Children, Inc. v. Carey, 711 F.2d 1136 (2d Cir. 1983). Defendants are hereby given leave to file such records or contemporaneous evidence of the reasonableness of their hours by Friday, March 29, 2024.
SO ORDERED. □□ ue Dated: March 22, 2024 ee MO ce New York, New York LEWIS J. LIMAN United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gong v. Sarnoff, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gong-v-sarnoff-nysd-2024.