Gondelman v. Bernhard
230 A.D. 787
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 15, 1930
StatusPublished
This text of 230 A.D. 787 (Gondelman v. Bernhard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Gondelman v. Bernhard, 230 A.D. 787 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Rich, Young, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents and votes for reversal and a new trial, being of opinion that there are questions of fact which should have been submitted to the jury.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
230 A.D. 787, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gondelman-v-bernhard-nyappdiv-1930.