Gonchar v. National Ass'n of Securities Dealers, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gonchar v. National Ass'n of Securities Dealers, Inc.

37 A.D.3d 369, 829 N.Y.S.2d 900

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 27, 2007

StatusPublished

This text of 37 A.D.3d 369 (Gonchar v. National Ass'n of Securities Dealers, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gonchar v. National Ass'n of Securities Dealers, Inc., 37 A.D.3d 369, 829 N.Y.S.2d 900 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol R. Edmead, J.), entered February 7, 2006, which dismissed this proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 to prohibit respondent Hearing Officer from barring petitioners’ use of subpoenas in a National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) disciplinary proceeding and denied proposed intervenor’s motion to intervene, unanimously dismissed as moot, without costs.

The disciplinary proceeding has concluded. Petitioners may appeal the Hearing Officer’s order internally through the NASD. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Sullivan, Williams and Catterson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol R. Edmead, J.), entered February 7, 2006, which dismissed this proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 to prohibit respondent Hearing Officer from barring petitioners’ use of subpoenas in a National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) disciplinary proceeding and denied proposed intervenor’s motion to intervene, unanimously dismissed as moot, without costs.

The disciplinary proceeding has concluded. Petitioners may appeal the Hearing Officer’s order internally through the NASD. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Sullivan, Williams and Catterson, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 A.D.3d 369, 829 N.Y.S.2d 900, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gonchar-v-national-assn-of-securities-dealers-inc-nyappdiv-2007.