Gomperts v. Hirschfield
This text of 242 A.D. 617 (Gomperts v. Hirschfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. [618]*618Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Martin, O’Malley and Untermyer, JJ.; Merrell and O’Malley, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse and grant the motion, on the authority of Kachel v. Stutz (137 App. Div. 199); McIntyre v. Branner (214 id. 145); Wheeler v. Duett (230 id. 392); Wilkolashi v. Hanavan (240 id. 867).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
242 A.D. 617, 271 N.Y.S. 1078, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gomperts-v-hirschfield-nyappdiv-1934.