Gomperts v. Hirschfield
242 A.D. 617, 271 N.Y.S. 1078
Opinion
Order affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. [618] Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Martin, O’Malley and Untermyer, JJ.; Merrell and O’Malley, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse and grant the motion, on the authority of Kachel v. Stutz (137 App. Div. 199); McIntyre v. Branner (214 id. 145); Wheeler v. Duett (230 id. 392); Wilkolashi v. Hanavan (240 id. 867).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gomperts v. Hirschfield, 242 A.D. 617, 271 N.Y.S. 1078 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).
242 A.D. 617 (Gomperts v. Hirschfield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kachel v. Stutz
137 A.D. 199 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)