Gomez Vivanco v. Holder

381 F. App'x 679
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJune 2, 2010
Docket08-70160
StatusUnpublished

This text of 381 F. App'x 679 (Gomez Vivanco v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gomez Vivanco v. Holder, 381 F. App'x 679 (9th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Rogelio Gomez Vivanco, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision finding him ineligible for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, Vasquez-Zavala v. Ashcroft, 324 F.3d 1105, 1107 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for review.

The agency properly concluded that Gomez Vivanco was ineligible for cancellation of removal because his conviction under CahPenal Code § 12025(a) constitutes a firearms offense for the purposes of 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(C). See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(b)(1)(C); Valerio-Ochoa v. INS, 241 F.3d 1092, 1095 (9th Cir.2001). The expungement of the conviction pursuant to Cal.Penal Code § 1203.4 did not eliminate the immigration consequences of the conviction. See Ramirez-Castro v. INS, 287 F.3d 1172, 1174-76 (9th Cir.2002).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
381 F. App'x 679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gomez-vivanco-v-holder-ca9-2010.