Gomez-Velazco v. Sessions
890 F.3d 1194
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMay 31, 2018
DocketNos. 14-71747; 14-73303
StatusPublished
This text of 890 F.3d 1194 (Gomez-Velazco v. Sessions) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Gomez-Velazco v. Sessions, 890 F.3d 1194 (9th Cir. 2018).
Opinion
A judge of the court sua sponte requested a vote on whether to rehear this case en banc. A vote was taken, and the matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the non-recused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. See Fed. R. App. P. 35(f). Rehearing en banc is DENIED .
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
890 F.3d 1194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gomez-velazco-v-sessions-ca9-2018.