Gomez v. State
This text of 341 S.W.2d 180 (Gomez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The offense is selling beer to a minor, as an agent of the licensee; the punishment, a fine of $100.00.
The record shows that appeal bond was entered into before the expiration of the term at which conviction was had and notice of appeal was given. Such a bond does not confer jurisdiction upon this Court to enter any order other than to dismiss the appeal.
The appeal is dismissed.
On Motion to Reinstate Appeal
After this court dismissed the appeal in the instant case because the appeal bond was made and approved during term time, appellant secured the trial court’s re-approval of that bond, which was long after the adjournment of the term of court at which the conviction was had.
Appellant insists that this reapproval of the bond by the trial court in all things validated the bond as a good appeal bond and that his appeal should be reinstated.
It is the date of the bond and the obligation of the principal and sureties thereon that control the validity of the bond.
At the time the bond was executed, no authority existed therefor. In the eyes of the law, then, it was a nullity. Reapproval of the bond could not render it valid.
The motion to reinstate the appeal is . overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
341 S.W.2d 180, 1960 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 3087, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gomez-v-state-texcrimapp-1960.