Gomez v. State of Nevada

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided March 8, 2024·No. 3:23-cv-00663·Unknown

Opinion

Attorney General Chief Deputy Attorney General Nevada Bar No. 4356 Deputy Attorney General Nevada Bar No. 16266 State of Nevada Office of the Attorney General 555 E. Washington Ave., Ste. 3900 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Tele: (702) 486-0661 Fax: (702) 486-3768 Email: cvandenberg@ag.nv.gov akrauff@ag.nv.gov Attorneys for Defendants, State of Nevada ex rel. its Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Public and Behavioral Health JOEL GOMEZ, Case No. 3:23-cv-00663-LRH-CLB Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING STATE OF NEVADA, ex rel. Dept. of STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Health & Human Services, Defendant. Plaintiff, JOEL GOMEZ, and Defendant, STATE OF NEVADA ex rel. its DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, DIVISION OF PUBLIC AND BEHAVIORAL HEALTH (“Defendant”), by and through their counsel, hereby stipulate to the following terms of this Stipulated Protective Order to protect the confidentiality of confidential information obtained by the parties in connection with this case: / / / 1. Confidential Information. Any party or non-party may designate as “CONFIDENTIAL” (by stamping the relevant page or otherwise set forth herein) any document or response to discovery which that party or non-party considers in good faith to contain information including, but not limited to, trade secrets; proprietary data; marketing information; financial information; personnel information of any current or former employees of the Defendant; information concerning corrective action including warnings, reprimands, disciplinary action, and/or termination of any current or former employees of the Defendant; information concerning applications, ratings, and decisions made by the Defendant regarding the promotion and/or hiring of employees; information which is confidential under Nevada Administrative Code 284.718; and/or similar commercially sensitive information of the type contemplated by Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or Nevada law (“Confidential Information”). Where a document or response consists of more than one page, the first page and each page on which confidential information appears shall be so designated. 2. Designating Material as Confidential. A party or non-party may designate information disclosed during a deposition or in response to written discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL” by so indicating in said response. Or a party or non-party may designate in writing, within forty-five (45) days after receipt of said responses or of the deposition transcript for which the designation is proposed, that specific pages of the transcript and/or specific responses be treated as confidential information. Any other party may object to such proposal, in writing or on the record. Upon such objection, the parties shall follow the procedures described in paragraph 8 below. After any designation made according to the procedure set forth in this paragraph, the designated documents or information shall be treated according to the designation until the matter is resolved according to the procedures described in paragraph 10 below, and counsel for all parties shall be responsible for making all previously unmarked copies of the designated material in their possession or control with the specific designation. 3. Use of Confidential Information. All information produced or exchanged in the course of this case (other than information that is publicly available) shall be used by the party or parties to whom the information is produced solely for the purpose of this case. 4. Disclosure of Confidential Information. Except with the prior written consent of other parties, or upon the prior order of this Court obtained upon notice to opposing counsel, Confidential Information shall not be disclosed to any person other than: a. Counsel for the respective parties to this litigation and co-counsel retained for this litigation, including partners and associates who assist them in this matter, Bureau Chiefs, Chief Deputy Attorneys General, Senior Deputy Attorneys General, Deputy Attorneys General, paralegals, clerical and secretarial staff employed by such counsel; b. Individual parties, class representatives, any officer or employee of a party, to the extent deemed necessary by counsel for the prosecution or defense of this litigation; c. Non-party consultants or expert witnesses retained for the prosecution or defense of this litigation, provided that before being shown or given any Confidential Information, each such person shall sign a certification (“Certification”) stating the following: I certify my understanding that any documents, information, answers, responses, and/or other materials that are provided to me in this case are subject to the terms and restrictions of the Stipulated Protective Order in Joel Gomez v. State of Nevada, Department of Health and Human Services, filed in the U.S. District Court of Nevada, Case No. 3:23-cv- 00663-LRH-CLB (the “Order”). I have been given a copy and have read that Order. I have had its meaning and effect explained to me by counsel who provided me with the above-described information. I understand that any such information and/or documents, and any copies, notes or other memoranda regarding information in such documents, shall not be disclosed to others except in accordance with that Order, and shall be used only for purposes of this proceeding. I agree to comply with the Order. The Certification shall be retained by counsel to the party so disclosing the Confidential Information and made available for inspection by opposing counsel during the pendency or after the termination of the action; d. Any authors or recipients of the confidential information; e. The Court, Court personnel, court reporters, and videographers; / / / f. Witnesses (other than persons described in paragraph 4(d)). A witness shall sign the Certification before being shown a confidential document. Confidential Information may be disclosed to a witness who will not sign the Certification only in a deposition at which the party who designated the Confidential Information is represented or has been given notice that Confidential Information shall be designated “Confidential” pursuant to paragraph 2 above. Witnesses shown Confidential Information shall not be allowed to retain copies; g. Members of the jury in this case; h. Professional vendors that provide litigation support services, employees of independent copy services, printers or illustrators, for the sole purpose of making copies of documents and exhibits to be used in this litigation; i. Such other persons as Plaintiff and Defendants may agree upon in writing; and j. Such other persons as the Court may order upon application of Plaintiff or Defendants. 5. Notice of Stipulated Protective Order. Any persons receiving or being shown Confidential Information shall be advised that the Confidential Information is being disclosed pursuant to an Order of the Court and that they shall not reveal or discuss such information to or with any person who is not entitled to receive such information, except as set forth herein. 6. Filing of Confidential Information. Unless otherwise permitted by statute, rule or prior court order, papers filed with the Court under seal shall be accompanied by a contemporaneous motion for leave to file those documents under seal and shall be filed consistent with Local Rule IA 10-5 and the Court’s electronic filing procedures. Notwithstanding any agreement among the parties, the party seeking to file a paper under seal bears the burden of overcoming the presumption in favor of public access to papers filed in court. See Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.2d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006); Pintos v. Pac. Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 677–78 (9th Cir. 2010); see also Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gomez v. State of Nevada, (D. Nev. 2024).

Gomez v. State of Nevada (Gomez v. State of Nevada) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N
605 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
United States v. Lowell M. Birrell
447 F.2d 1168 (Second Circuit, 1971)
Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC
809 F.3d 1092 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)