Gomez v. Riteway Insurance Repair Service, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gomez v. Riteway Insurance Repair Service, Inc.

721 So. 2d 426, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 15065, 1998 WL 842731

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 2, 1998

DocketNo. 98-1407

StatusPublished

This text of 721 So. 2d 426 (Gomez v. Riteway Insurance Repair Service, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gomez v. Riteway Insurance Repair Service, Inc., 721 So. 2d 426, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 15065, 1998 WL 842731 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of the appellants’ motion to dissolve the temporary injunction. See Wise v. Schmidek, 649 So.2d 336 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Richard v. Behavioral Healthcare Options, Inc., 647 So.2d 976 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Coastal Unilube, Inc. v. Smith, 598 So.2d 200 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). This affirmance is without prejudice to the appellants to raise the same issues upon any plenary appeal.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of the appellants’ motion to dissolve the temporary injunction. See Wise v. Schmidek, 649 So.2d 336 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Richard v. Behavioral Healthcare Options, Inc., 647 So.2d 976 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Coastal Unilube, Inc. v. Smith, 598 So.2d 200 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). This affirmance is without prejudice to the appellants to raise the same issues upon any plenary appeal.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

721 So. 2d 426, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 15065, 1998 WL 842731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gomez-v-riteway-insurance-repair-service-inc-fladistctapp-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack