Gomez v. OUR LADY OF THE LAKE MED. CENTER

943 So. 2d 499, 2006 WL 2636302
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedSeptember 15, 2006
Docket2005 CA 1916
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 943 So. 2d 499 (Gomez v. OUR LADY OF THE LAKE MED. CENTER) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gomez v. OUR LADY OF THE LAKE MED. CENTER, 943 So. 2d 499, 2006 WL 2636302 (La. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

943 So.2d 499 (2006)

Brenda M. GOMEZ
v.
OUR LADY OF THE LAKE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER.

No. 2005 CA 1916.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

September 15, 2006.

Denise A. Vinet, Baton Rouge, for Plaintiff/Appellant, Brenda M. Gomez.

Anthony P. Palermo, Matthew P. Bonham, Baton Rouge, for Defendant/Appellee, Our Lady of the Lake Regional Medical Center.

Before: CARTER, C.J., WHIPPLE and McDONALD, JJ.

CARTER, C.J.

Brenda Gomez, the claimant in this workers' compensation proceeding, appeals a judgment sustaining a peremptory exception raising the objection of prescription and dismissing her claim for workers' compensation benefits. There is no dispute that Gomez's claim was prescribed on its face. The Workers' Compensation Judge (WCJ) found that Gomez did not prove that prescription was suspended or interrupted. Gomez appeals, contending the WCJ erred in this finding.

After thoroughly reviewing the record herein, we cannot say that the WCJ was clearly wrong in finding that Gomez did not meet her burden of proving that prescription was interrupted or suspended. Specifically, the record does not establish that Gomez was paid wages in lieu of compensation benefits or that she was lulled into a false sense of security. A reasonable factual basis exists for the WCJ's ruling; therefore, his findings cannot be manifestly erroneous.

The judgment of the Office of Workers' Compensation is affirmed in accordance with URCA Rule 2-16.1B. Costs of this appeal are assessed to Brenda Gomez.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hernandez v. ASAP Emp't Serv., Inc.
266 So. 3d 299 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
943 So. 2d 499, 2006 WL 2636302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gomez-v-our-lady-of-the-lake-med-center-lactapp-2006.