Gomez v. Ollison
This text of 259 F. App'x 42 (Gomez v. Ollison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Denver Gonzales Gomez, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s summary dismissal without prejudice of his habeas corpus petition brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He claims that prison officials have denied him his constitutional right of access to the courts by preventing him from obtaining audio and video tapes that he must review prior to filing a post-conviction petition challenging his criminal conviction. We affirm the district court’s ruling that Gomez’s claim does not directly challenge the fact or duration of his confinement and therefore may not be brought in a habeas corpus petition. See Osborne v. District Attorney’s Office, 423 F.3d 1050, 1054 (9th Cir.2005); Docken v. Chase, 393 F.3d 1024, 1028 (9th Cir. 2004).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
259 F. App'x 42, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gomez-v-ollison-ca9-2007.