Gomez v. New York State Thruway Authority

New York Court of Appeals

Gomez v. New York State Thruway Authority

532 N.E.2d 93, 73 N.Y.2d 724, 535 N.Y.S.2d 587, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 3322

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 17, 1988

DocketClaim 69823

StatusPublished

Cited by21 cases

This text of 532 N.E.2d 93 (Gomez v. New York State Thruway Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gomez v. New York State Thruway Authority, 532 N.E.2d 93, 73 N.Y.2d 724, 535 N.Y.S.2d 587, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 3322 (N.Y. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Claimant was injured when he was involved in an accident on a Thruway bridge over the Wallkill River. The accident occurred when his vehicle skidded on the icy surface of the highway, traveled up a pile of frozen snow plowed against a guardrail of the bridge and flipped over. Claimant instituted this action seeking to recover from the Authority for negligently maintaining the road and the guardrails. The Court of Claims found that defendant had negligently failed in its duty to maintain the guardrails for the purpose intended and that its failure proximately caused claimant’s injuries. It awarded him $510,000 damages and a divided Appellate Division affirmed the judgment.

The State has an obligation to provide and maintain adequate and proper barriers along its highways (see, Lattanzi v State of New York, 74 AD2d 378, affd 53 NY2d 1045) and its failure to do so may result in liability if the failure is a substantial factor in causing or aggravating a claimant’s injuries (Gutelle v City of New York, 55 NY2d 794; Stuart-Bullock v State of New York, 33 NY2d 418). Insofar as the courts below found that the Thruway had failed to fulfill this duty and that its failure was a substantial factor in producing claimant’s injuries and those findings are supported by evidence in the record, they are beyond our review.

*726 Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Claimant was injured when he was involved in an accident on a Thruway bridge over the Wallkill River. The accident occurred when his vehicle skidded on the icy surface of the highway, traveled up a pile of frozen snow plowed against a guardrail of the bridge and flipped over. Claimant instituted this action seeking to recover from the Authority for negligently maintaining the road and the guardrails. The Court of Claims found that defendant had negligently failed in its duty to maintain the guardrails for the purpose intended and that its failure proximately caused claimant’s injuries. It awarded him $510,000 damages and a divided Appellate Division affirmed the judgment.

The State has an obligation to provide and maintain adequate and proper barriers along its highways (see, Lattanzi v State of New York, 74 AD2d 378, affd 53 NY2d 1045) and its failure to do so may result in liability if the failure is a substantial factor in causing or aggravating a claimant’s injuries (Gutelle v City of New York, 55 NY2d 794; Stuart-Bullock v State of New York, 33 NY2d 418). Insofar as the courts below found that the Thruway had failed to fulfill this duty and that its failure was a substantial factor in producing claimant’s injuries and those findings are supported by evidence in the record, they are beyond our review.

*726 Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

532 N.E.2d 93, 73 N.Y.2d 724, 535 N.Y.S.2d 587, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 3322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gomez-v-new-york-state-thruway-authority-ny-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack