Gomez v. Marta

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Gomez v. Marta

414 S.E.2d 747, 202 Ga. App. 161, 1991 Ga. App. LEXIS 1709

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedDecember 3, 1991

DocketA90A0960

StatusPublished

This text of 414 S.E.2d 747 (Gomez v. Marta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gomez v. Marta, 414 S.E.2d 747, 202 Ga. App. 161, 1991 Ga. App. LEXIS 1709 (Ga. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

Beasley, Judge.

Our reversal of the trial court’s grant of MARTA’s motion for directed verdict having been reversed by the Supreme Court in MARTA v. Gomez, 261 Ga. 617 (409 SE2d 35) (1991), our decision in Gomez v. MARTA, 197 Ga. App. 834 (399 SE2d 536) (1990), is hereby vacated and the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this Court. The grant of MARTA’s motion for directed verdict is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Sognier, C. J., McMurray, P. J., Birdsong, P. J., Carley, P. J., Pope, Cooper, Andrews, JJ., and Judge Arnold Shulman concur. [162]*162Decided December 3, 1991. McKenney & Froelich, William J. McKenney, David M. Kupsky for appellants. Pursley, Howell, Lowery & Meeks, Charles N. Pursley, Jr., Neely & Player, John T. Ruff, for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beasley, Judge.

Our reversal of the trial court’s grant of MARTA’s motion for directed verdict having been reversed by the Supreme Court in MARTA v. Gomez, 261 Ga. 617 (409 SE2d 35) (1991), our decision in Gomez v. MARTA, 197 Ga. App. 834 (399 SE2d 536) (1990), is hereby vacated and the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this Court. The grant of MARTA’s motion for directed verdict is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Sognier, C. J., McMurray, P. J., Birdsong, P. J., Carley, P. J., Pope, Cooper, Andrews, JJ., and Judge Arnold Shulman concur. [162]*162Decided December 3, 1991. McKenney & Froelich, William J. McKenney, David M. Kupsky for appellants. Pursley, Howell, Lowery & Meeks, Charles N. Pursley, Jr., Neely & Player, John T. Ruff, for appellees.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

414 S.E.2d 747, 202 Ga. App. 161, 1991 Ga. App. LEXIS 1709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gomez-v-marta-gactapp-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack