Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Gomez v. Marta

Gomez v. Marta

414 S.E.2d 747, 202 Ga. App. 161, 1991 Ga. App. LEXIS 1709
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 3, 1991·No. A90A0960·Published

Opinion

Beasley, Judge.

Our reversal of the trial court’s grant of MARTA’s motion for directed verdict having been reversed by the Supreme Court in MARTA v. Gomez, 261 Ga. 617 (409 SE2d 35) (1991), our decision in Gomez v. MARTA, 197 Ga. App. 834 (399 SE2d 536) (1990), is hereby vacated and the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this Court. The grant of MARTA’s motion for directed verdict is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Sognier, C. J., McMurray, P. J., Birdsong, P. J., Carley, P. J., Pope, Cooper, Andrews, JJ., and Judge Arnold Shulman concur. [162]*162Decided December 3, 1991. McKenney & Froelich, William J. McKenney, David M. Kupsky for appellants. Pursley, Howell, Lowery & Meeks, Charles N. Pursley, Jr., Neely & Player, John T. Ruff, for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gomez v. Marta, 414 S.E.2d 747, 202 Ga. App. 161, 1991 Ga. App. LEXIS 1709 (Ga. Ct. App. 1991).

414 S.E.2d 747 (Gomez v. Marta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marta v. Gomez
409 S.E.2d 35 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1991)
Gomez v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority
399 S.E.2d 536 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1990)