Gomez v. Maass

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Gomez v. Maass

846 P.2d 448, 118 Or. App. 160, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 154

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedFebruary 10, 1993

Docket92C10655, 92C10737; CA A74735 (Control), A75053

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 846 P.2d 448 (Gomez v. Maass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gomez v. Maass, 846 P.2d 448, 118 Or. App. 160, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 154 (Or. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Plaintiff filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus on April 10,1992, alleging that he had been denied treatment for a serious mental condition. He filed a second petition on April 24, 1992, alleging that he is confined in frigid quarters, causing him to suffer ongoing mental and physical deterioration as a result of which he has become ill on a number of occasions.

Both petitions were dismissed because they did not allege facts sufficient to invoke habeas corpus jurisdiction.

The state concedes the trial court erred in dismissing the April 10 petition. There was no error with respect to the order on the April 24 petition.

Dismissal of April 10, 1992, petition reversed and remanded; otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI