Gomez v. Kelly

New York Court of Appeals

Gomez v. Kelly

913 N.E.2d 409, 12 N.Y.3d 883

New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 24, 2009·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order, insofar as appealed from, reversed, with costs, and petition dismissed in its entirety. We cannot say that “the penalty . . . imposed by the Commissioner shocks the judicial conscience” (Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, 40 [2001]).

Concur: Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones. Taking no part: Chief Judge Lippman.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order, insofar as appealed from, reversed, with costs, and petition dismissed in its entirety. We cannot say that “the penalty . . . imposed by the Commissioner shocks the judicial conscience” (Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, 40 [2001]).

Concur: Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones. Taking no part: Chief Judge Lippman.

Gomez v. Kelly, 913 N.E.2d 409, 12 N.Y.3d 883 (N.Y. 2009).

Pincite

913 N.E.2d 409 (Gomez v. Kelly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related