Gomez v. Joyce

24 Jones & S. 607
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedJune 20, 1888
StatusPublished

This text of 24 Jones & S. 607 (Gomez v. Joyce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gomez v. Joyce, 24 Jones & S. 607 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1888).

Opinion

The Court held (Per Curiam) that the words spoken were actionable per se, and therefore the jury might give exemplary damages as well as damages for plaintiff’s mental disturbance and suffering; and reversed the judgment and ordered a new trial.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 Jones & S. 607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gomez-v-joyce-nysuperctnyc-1888.