Gomez v. Green

4 Wend. 206
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1830
StatusPublished

This text of 4 Wend. 206 (Gomez v. Green) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gomez v. Green, 4 Wend. 206 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1830).

Opinion

Costs. The plaintiff in error in this cause at a previous term obtained a judgment of reversal of a common pleas judgment by default, which was set aside on the defendants coming in and excusing their default on payment of costs; and the question was, what costs were to be paid, the costs of the térm and subsequent proceedings only, or a full bill of costs ? The Court said that the former only could be charged, i. e. the costs of the term and of the subsequent proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Wend. 206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gomez-v-green-nysupct-1830.