Gomez v. Fremont

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 4, 2026
DocketIndex No. 23727/19|Appeal No. 6813|Case No. 2025-01612|
StatusPublished

This text of Gomez v. Fremont (Gomez v. Fremont) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gomez v. Fremont, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

Gomez v Fremont - 2026 NY Slip Op 03507
skip to main content

It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.

Law Reporting
Bureau
Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter

Gomez v Fremont

2026 NY Slip Op 03507

June 4, 2026

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Aquiles Gomez, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v

Eddy Fremont et al., Defendants-Appellants, Baker, McEvoy & Moskovits, Nonparty Appellant.

Decided and Entered: June 04, 2026

Index No. 23727/19|Appeal No. 6813|Case No. 2025-01612|

Before: Scarpulla, J.P., Shulman, O'neill Levy, Chan, JJ.

Marjorie E. Bornes, Freeport, for appellants.

[*1]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John A. Howard-Algarin, J.), entered on or about February 24, 2025, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, ordered nonparty Baker, McEvoy & Moskovits to substitute a representative for the deceased defendant Mohammad Javaid, unanimously reversed, on the law with costs, and the order vacated.

The court should not have ordered nonparty law firm—former counsel to deceased defendant Javaid—to substitute a representative for Javaid (see Wisdom v Wisdom, 111 AD2d 13, 14-15 [1st Dept 1985]). The death of a party terminates their attorney's power to act on their behalf (see Snipes v Schmidt, 166 AD3d 483, 483 [1st Dept 2018]; see also CPLR 1015[a]). The court's power in this circumstance was limited to the procedures outlined in CPLR 1021 (see CPLR 1021).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: June 4, 2026

Court Decisions

All Court Decisions Official Reports Service Bound Volumes Decision Search

Resources

RSS Feeds Style Manual Citation Tools Opinion Formatting & Privacy Guidelines Opinion Selection Criteria Legal Research Portal Site Index

About

About the Law Reporting Bureau About our Operations Contact Us Twitter

Quick Contact Info

17 Lodge Street

Albany, NY 12207

Phone: (518) 453-6900

Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wisdom v. Wisdom
111 A.D.2d 13 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Gomez v. Fremont, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gomez-v-fremont-nyappdiv-2026.