Gomez v. Davis

502 F. App'x 815
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided December 18, 2012·No. No. 11-11733·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Orlando Gomez appeals the dismissal of his complaint for failure to state a claim. He argues that the district court should have granted him leave to amend before closing this case. We agree. We shall grant Gomez leave to amend his complaint. On remand, we urge Gomez to consult the standards articulated in Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009) and Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 127 S.Ct. 1955, 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007), and to include sufficient facts in his complaint from which the district court can deduce whether they “plausibly suggest an entitlement to relief.” Without such facts, Gomez’s complaint will again be subject to dismissal.

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS TO REOPEN CASE AND GRANT LEAVE TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gomez v. Davis, 502 F. App'x 815 (11th Cir. 2012).

502 F. App'x 815 (Gomez v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly
550 U.S. 544 (Supreme Court, 2007)
Ashcroft v. Iqbal
556 U.S. 662 (Supreme Court, 2009)