Gomez v. Country Club Apartments at Bonaventure

528 So. 2d 907, 1988 WL 38016
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 27, 1988·No. No. 87-1636·Published

Opinion

ON REHEARING

GUNTHER, Judge.

Appellants’ motion for rehearing to clarify opinion is granted and we substitute the following opinion.

We reverse. The trial court erred in denying appellants’ motion to vacate default and in entering default judgment against appellants. The entry of default was improper since appellants’ motion to transfer/consolidate was pending before the court at the time the default was entered. Accordingly, the entry of the default and default judgment are reversed. Harth v. Margaretten and Co., 513 So.2d 1083 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.500(c).

DOWNEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gomez v. Country Club Apartments at Bonaventure, 528 So. 2d 907, 1988 WL 38016 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

528 So. 2d 907 (Gomez v. Country Club Apartments at Bonaventure) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harth v. Margaretten & Co.
513 So. 2d 1083 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)