Gomez v. American Savings & Loan Ass'n
This text of 515 So. 2d 301 (Gomez v. American Savings & Loan Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It was error to enter summary judgment in favor of plaintiff, American Savings and Loan Association, because there were disputed and unresolved questions of material fact which prevented entry of judgment as a matter of law. Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.510(c). For instance, there was an issue as to whether American gave written notice of appellants’ breach of the mortgage agreement as provided in paragraph eighteen thereof, F.A. Chastain Construction, Inc. v. Pratt, 146 So.2d 910, 913 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962), and there were unresolved issues as concerns appellants’ affirmative defenses. Pandol Brothers, Inc. v. NCNB National [302]*302Bank of Florida, 450 So.2d 592, 594 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).
REVERSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
515 So. 2d 301, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2495, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gomez-v-american-savings-loan-assn-fladistctapp-1987.