Gomez-Jimenez v. New York Law School

987 N.E.2d 639, 20 N.Y.3d 1093, 2013 NY Slip Op 68698, 965 N.Y.S.2d 78, 2013 WL 1235500, 2013 N.Y. LEXIS 566
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 28, 2013
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 987 N.E.2d 639 (Gomez-Jimenez v. New York Law School) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gomez-Jimenez v. New York Law School, 987 N.E.2d 639, 20 N.Y.3d 1093, 2013 NY Slip Op 68698, 965 N.Y.S.2d 78, 2013 WL 1235500, 2013 N.Y. LEXIS 566 (N.Y. 2013).

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal denied with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read and Pigott. Judge Smith dissenting and voting to grant leave to appeal.

Taking no part: Judge Rivera.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Landesbank Baden-Württemberg v. RBS Holdings USA Inc.
14 F. Supp. 3d 488 (S.D. New York, 2014)
Ward v. TheLadders.com, Inc.
3 F. Supp. 3d 151 (S.D. New York, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
987 N.E.2d 639, 20 N.Y.3d 1093, 2013 NY Slip Op 68698, 965 N.Y.S.2d 78, 2013 WL 1235500, 2013 N.Y. LEXIS 566, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gomez-jimenez-v-new-york-law-school-ny-2013.