Gomez-Flecha v. Commissioner

110 F. App'x 146
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided October 14, 2004·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After carefully considering the briefs and record on appeal, we affirm for substantially the reasons stated by the magistrate judge.

Despite his obesity, substantial evidence supported the determination that the appellant was not disabled. Irlanda Ortiz v. Sec’y. of Health and Human Serv., 955 F.2d 765 (1st Cir.1991). The appellant does not establish that the ALJ failed to apply the proper standard in evaluating his pain. Avery v. Sec’y. of Health and Human Serv., 797 F.2d 19 (1st Cir.1986). The appellant’s other arguments are equally unavailing.

Affirmed. 1st Circ. Rule 27(c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gomez-Flecha v. Commissioner, 110 F. App'x 146 (1st Cir. 2004).

110 F. App'x 146 (Gomez-Flecha v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related