Gomez-Flecha v. Commissioner
This text of 110 F. App'x 146 (Gomez-Flecha v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
After carefully considering the briefs and record on appeal, we affirm for substantially the reasons stated by the magistrate judge.
Despite his obesity, substantial evidence supported the determination that the appellant was not disabled. Irlanda Ortiz v. Sec’y. of Health and Human Serv., 955 F.2d 765 (1st Cir.1991). The appellant does not establish that the ALJ failed to apply the proper standard in evaluating his pain. Avery v. Sec’y. of Health and Human Serv., 797 F.2d 19 (1st Cir.1986). The appellant’s other arguments are equally unavailing.
Affirmed. 1st Circ. Rule 27(c).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
110 F. App'x 146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gomez-flecha-v-commissioner-ca1-2004.