Gomez-Fleca v. Comm. of Soc. Sec.

First Circuit

Gomez-Fleca v. Comm. of Soc. Sec.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit

DecidedOctober 14, 2004

Docket04-1131

StatusPublished

This text of Gomez-Fleca v. Comm. of Soc. Sec. (Gomez-Fleca v. Comm. of Soc. Sec.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gomez-Fleca v. Comm. of Soc. Sec., (1st Cir. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Not for Publication in West's Federal Reporter Citation Limited Pursuant to 1st Cir. Loc. R. 32.3

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 04-1131

VICTOR GOMEZ-FLECHA,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant, Appellee.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

[Hon. Justo Arenas, U.S. Magistrate Judge]

Before

Boudin, Chief Judge, Lipez and Howard, Circuit Judges.

Melba N. Rivera-Camacho on brief for appellant. Robert M. Peckrill, Assistant Regional Counsel, Social Security Administration, H.S. Garcia, United States Attorney, and Lisa E. Bhatia, Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.

October 14, 2004 Per Curiam. After carefully considering the briefs and record

on appeal, we affirm for substantially the reasons stated by the

magistrate judge.

Despite his obesity, substantial evidence supported the

determination that the appellant was not disabled. Irlanda Ortiz

v. Sec'y. of Health and Human Serv., 955 F.2d 765 (1st Cir. 1991).

The appellant does not establish that the ALJ failed to apply the

proper standard in evaluating his pain. Avery v. Sec'y. of Health

and Human Serv., 797 F.2d 19 (1st Cir 1986). The appellant's other

arguments are equally unavailing.

Affirmed. 1st Circ. Rule 27(c).

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI