Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Gomez-Cortes v. Agency for Health Care Admin.

Gomez-Cortes v. Agency for Health Care Admin.

251 So. 3d 356
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 24, 2018
DocketNo. 1D17-4280
StatusPublished

This text of 251 So. 3d 356 (Gomez-Cortes v. Agency for Health Care Admin.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gomez-Cortes v. Agency for Health Care Admin., 251 So. 3d 356 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

*357Appellant contends that the Agency for Health Care Administration erred when it denied his motion to vacate without affording him an evidentiary hearing to resolve the factual question of whether he received sufficient notice of AHCA's final orders. We agree. See Reich v. Dep't of Health , 868 So.2d 1275, 1276 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).

REVERSED and REMANDED .

Wolf, Jay, and Winsor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reich v. Department of Health
868 So. 2d 1275 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
251 So. 3d 356, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gomez-cortes-v-agency-for-health-care-admin-fladistctapp-2018.