Gomez-Cortes v. Agency for Health Care Admin.

251 So. 3d 356
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 24, 2018·No. No. 1D17-4280·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

*357Appellant contends that the Agency for Health Care Administration erred when it denied his motion to vacate without affording him an evidentiary hearing to resolve the factual question of whether he received sufficient notice of AHCA's final orders. We agree. See Reich v. Dep't of Health , 868 So.2d 1275, 1276 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).

REVERSED and REMANDED .

Wolf, Jay, and Winsor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gomez-Cortes v. Agency for Health Care Admin., 251 So. 3d 356 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

251 So. 3d 356 (Gomez-Cortes v. Agency for Health Care Admin.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reich v. Department of Health
868 So. 2d 1275 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)