Gomes v. Safeco Insurance Co., No. 0104035 (Oct. 10, 1991)

1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 8978
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedOctober 10, 1991
DocketNo. 0104035
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 8978 (Gomes v. Safeco Insurance Co., No. 0104035 (Oct. 10, 1991)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gomes v. Safeco Insurance Co., No. 0104035 (Oct. 10, 1991), 1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 8978 (Colo. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE MOTION TO STRIKE PLEADING #106 The defendant moves to strike two claims for relief for double and treble damages on the ground that double or treble damages are not allowable under a suit under the provisions of uninsured and underinsured coverages in the plaintiff's policy.

In Clamage v. Aetna Casualty Insurance Company, 5 CSCR 340 the court granted a motion to strike a claim for double or treble damages under the provision of an uninsured/underinsured motorist policy on the ground that the tortfeasor is the only person against whom double or treble damages may attach. Also in McGowan v. Aetna Casualty, 4 Conn. L. Rptr. No. 5. 149, the court decided that Conn. Gen. Stat 14-295 permits recovery of double and treble damages against the tortfeasor and not against the insurer carrier.

The plaintiff relies upon Minuto v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company.

The court agrees with the reasoning of Clamage and McGowan courts.

Accordingly, the motion to strike is granted. CT Page 8979

FRANK S. MEADOW, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Perelli
5 Conn. Super. Ct. 338 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 8978, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gomes-v-safeco-insurance-co-no-0104035-oct-10-1991-connsuperct-1991.