Gomes v. Holder

Fourth Circuit

Gomes v. Holder

547 F. App'x 366

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 16, 2013·No. No. 13-1403·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Albert James Gomes and his wife, Arlene Maria Gomes, natives and citizens of Bangladesh, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying their motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (b) (2013). We therefore deny the petition for review. See In re: Gomes (B.I.A.Feb.27, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Albert James Gomes and his wife, Arlene Maria Gomes, natives and citizens of Bangladesh, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying their motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (b) (2013). We therefore deny the petition for review. See In re: Gomes (B.I.A.Feb.27, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Gomes v. Holder, 547 F. App'x 366 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

547 F. App'x 366 (Gomes v. Holder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related