Gomes v. Holder
This text of 547 F. App'x 366 (Gomes v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Albert James Gomes and his wife, Arlene Maria Gomes, natives and citizens of Bangladesh, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying their motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (b) (2013). We therefore deny the petition for review. See In re: Gomes (B.I.A.Feb.27, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
547 F. App'x 366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gomes-v-holder-ca4-2013.