Gomes v. Gomes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gomes v. Gomes

57 A.D.2d 565, 393 N.Y.S.2d 453, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11532

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 11, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 57 A.D.2d 565 (Gomes v. Gomes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gomes v. Gomes, 57 A.D.2d 565, 393 N.Y.S.2d 453, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11532 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In a matrimonial action, defendant appeals, as limited by his notice of appeal and brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated December 23, 1975, as, after a nonjury trial, fixed the amounts of alimony and child support and awarded a counsel fee. Judgment modified, on the facts, by reducing the award of alimony to the amount of $50 per week and by reducing the counsel fee to the amount of $2,000. As so modified, judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. The amounts awarded as alimony and counsel fees were excessive to the extent indicated herein. Margett, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Titone and O’Con-nor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a matrimonial action, defendant appeals, as limited by his notice of appeal and brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated December 23, 1975, as, after a nonjury trial, fixed the amounts of alimony and child support and awarded a counsel fee. Judgment modified, on the facts, by reducing the award of alimony to the amount of $50 per week and by reducing the counsel fee to the amount of $2,000. As so modified, judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. The amounts awarded as alimony and counsel fees were excessive to the extent indicated herein. Margett, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Titone and O’Con-nor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 A.D.2d 565, 393 N.Y.S.2d 453, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11532, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gomes-v-gomes-nyappdiv-1977.