Golubovych v. Saks 5th Avenue, Inc.
Opinion
VOL UMIEIN LT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DATE FILED:_ □□□□□□□□ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK LARYSA V. GOLUBOVYCH, Plaintiff, 1:22-cv-9923-MKV -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL SAKS 5TH AVENUE, INC., Defendant.
MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Court has been notified that the parties have reached a settlement in principle. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and as long as the application to restore the action is made by June 2, 2025. If no such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004).
SO ORDERED. | i / lene Date: May 1, 2025 vn Kk wakoor New York, NY United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Golubovych v. Saks 5th Avenue, Inc. (Golubovych v. Saks 5th Avenue, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.