Golub v. Frank
106 A.D.2d 259, 484 N.Y.S.2d 389, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21318
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 4, 1984·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Allen Murray Myers, J.), entered on June 28, 1984, unanimously affirmed, without prejudice to any appropriate application to recover for use and occupancy. Respondents shall recover of appellant $75 costs and disbursements of this appeal. No opinion. Concur — Carro, J. P., Bloom, Fein, Milonas and Kassal, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Golub v. Frank, 106 A.D.2d 259, 484 N.Y.S.2d 389, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21318 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).
106 A.D.2d 259 (Golub v. Frank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hudson Associates v. Benoit
226 A.D.2d 196 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Roman v. Abrams
822 F.2d 214 (Second Circuit, 1987)
Michael Roman v. Robert Abrams, Attorney General of the State of New York, Harold Schreiber v. Dominick R. Salamack, Superintendent of Edgecombe Correctional Facility
822 F.2d 214 (Second Circuit, 1987)
Schreiber v. Salamack
619 F. Supp. 1433 (S.D. New York, 1985)
Roman v. Abrams
608 F. Supp. 629 (S.D. New York, 1985)