Golub v. Frank

106 A.D.2d 259, 484 N.Y.S.2d 389, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21318
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 4, 1984
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 106 A.D.2d 259 (Golub v. Frank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Golub v. Frank, 106 A.D.2d 259, 484 N.Y.S.2d 389, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21318 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Allen Murray Myers, J.), entered on June 28, 1984, unanimously affirmed, without prejudice to any appropriate application to recover for use and occupancy. Respondents shall recover of appellant $75 costs and disbursements of this appeal. No opinion. Concur — Carro, J. P., Bloom, Fein, Milonas and Kassal, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hudson Associates v. Benoit
226 A.D.2d 196 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Roman v. Abrams
822 F.2d 214 (Second Circuit, 1987)
Schreiber v. Salamack
619 F. Supp. 1433 (S.D. New York, 1985)
Roman v. Abrams
608 F. Supp. 629 (S.D. New York, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
106 A.D.2d 259, 484 N.Y.S.2d 389, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/golub-v-frank-nyappdiv-1984.