Goltzman v. Flug
Opinion
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondent Justice Phyllis O. Plug to grant a jury trial pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 173 in an underlying matrimonial action entitled Goltzman v Goltzman, pending in the Supreme Court, Queens County.
Adjudged that the proceeding is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.
In papers submitted in opposition to this proceeding the Attorney-General asserts that Justice Phyllis O. Plug has granted a jury trial in the underlying action on the issue of the grounds for a divorce pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 173. Accordingly, this proceeding is dismissed as academic. Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Rosenblatt, Miller and Sullivan, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
253 A.D.2d 778 (Goltzman v. Flug) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.