Goltz v. Art Awning Manufacturing Co.
238 A.D. 794
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 15, 1933
StatusPublished
This text of 238 A.D. 794 (Goltz v. Art Awning Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Goltz v. Art Awning Manufacturing Co., 238 A.D. 794 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. The alleged error with respect to the charge is not adequately presented on this record. (Govers v. Hofstatter, 41 App. Div. 384.) It does not appear that the matter complained of prejudicially affected the result. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Govers v. Hofstatter
41 A.D. 384 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1899)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
238 A.D. 794, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goltz-v-art-awning-manufacturing-co-nyappdiv-1933.