Goltry v. Ruckman

3 N.J.L. 427
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedSeptember 15, 1808
StatusPublished

This text of 3 N.J.L. 427 (Goltry v. Ruckman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goltry v. Ruckman, 3 N.J.L. 427 (N.J. 1808).

Opinion

By the Court.

We cannot reverse a judgment voluntarily confessed, for this cause; a convenience would arise, even in this case, from having the cause of action set out in the proceedings below; but the defendants below should have seen to that before they confessed judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 N.J.L. 427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goltry-v-ruckman-nj-1808.