Golstein v. Korol

107 N.Y.S. 27
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided November 29, 1907·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The release executed by the defendant Prager to the defendant Korol appears to have been admitted in evidence and marked as an exhibit. It is not attached to the return, and the case cannot be. determined without that instrument.

The return is therefore remitted to the files of this court, to en: able counsel to take such action therein as they may deem proper.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Golstein v. Korol, 107 N.Y.S. 27 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

107 N.Y.S. 27 (Golstein v. Korol) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.