Golphin v. State

557 So. 2d 232, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1184, 1990 WL 17510
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 28, 1990
DocketNo. 89-2870
StatusPublished

This text of 557 So. 2d 232 (Golphin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Golphin v. State, 557 So. 2d 232, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1184, 1990 WL 17510 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. By a prior plea of guilty and by reason of the appellant’s failure to raise the procedural claim raised in his motion for post-conviction relief, we believe the appellant has waived the procedural issue asserted below and in this appeal. Cf. Miller v. Florida, 482 U.S. 423, 107 S.Ct. 2446, 96 L.Ed.2d 351 (1987); Hubbard v. State, 411 So.2d 1312 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).

ANSTEAD, POLEN and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miller v. Florida
482 U.S. 423 (Supreme Court, 1987)
Hubbard v. State
411 So. 2d 1312 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
557 So. 2d 232, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1184, 1990 WL 17510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/golphin-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.