Golphin v. State
522 So. 2d 1043, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 882, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1345, 1988 WL 28294
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 6, 1988·No. No. 87-2885·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief because the motion makes no attempt to comply with the time requirements of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850; nor does it contain an explanation justifying the untimely filing as required by the rule.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Golphin v. State, 522 So. 2d 1043, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 882, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1345, 1988 WL 28294 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
522 So. 2d 1043 (Golphin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Elkins v. State
555 So. 2d 441 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)