Golphin v. State

522 So. 2d 1043, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 882, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1345, 1988 WL 28294
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 6, 1988
DocketNo. 87-2885
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 522 So. 2d 1043 (Golphin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Golphin v. State, 522 So. 2d 1043, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 882, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1345, 1988 WL 28294 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief because the motion makes no attempt to comply with the time requirements of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850; nor does it contain an explanation justifying the untimely filing as required by the rule.

ANSTEAD, LETTS and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Elkins v. State
555 So. 2d 441 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
522 So. 2d 1043, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 882, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1345, 1988 WL 28294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/golphin-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.