Gollet Enter. East, Inc. v. FLA. UNEMP. APP. COMMISSION

630 So. 2d 1166, 1993 WL 538194
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 29, 1993
Docket92-3689
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 630 So. 2d 1166 (Gollet Enter. East, Inc. v. FLA. UNEMP. APP. COMMISSION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gollet Enter. East, Inc. v. FLA. UNEMP. APP. COMMISSION, 630 So. 2d 1166, 1993 WL 538194 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

630 So.2d 1166 (1993)

GOLLET ENTERPRISES EAST, INC., Appellant,
v.
FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, and Melba E. Ray, Appellees.

No. 92-3689.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

December 29, 1993.

Brian J. Cooke, Koeppel, Cooke & Gottlieb, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

John D. Maher, Tallahassee, for appellee Unemployment Appeals Com'n.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm and quote with approval the Commission's conclusions as to the conduct of the president of the corporate owner's "fine dining, continental restaurant" in Palm Beach:

The claimant voluntarily left her position after an incident in which the owner was again verbally abusive to her. Throughout her employment, the claimant was subjected to repeated angry outbursts by the corporate president during which she shouted and cursed at employees. The final incident which prompted the claimant to leave was particularly abusive with profanity directed at the claimant and the president shouting and slamming things about. Although an employer has a right to correct or admonish employees in a reasonable manner when dissatisfied, an employee is not required to accept undue verbal abuse from the employer. Consequently, it must be concluded that the claimant voluntarily left employment with good cause attributable to the employer.

(Emphasis added.)

Hopefully, other employers and employees will take note of the decision and be advised as to what is unacceptable conduct on the *1167 part of the former and as to what recourse the latter has.

GLICKSTEIN, STONE and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Steven A. Salvatore v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission
168 So. 3d 351 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
Halstead v. Florida Unemployment Appeals
12 So. 3d 858 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Yaeger v. FLA. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N
786 So. 2d 48 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Miot v. Dade County School Board
741 So. 2d 641 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Butler Carpet Co. v. Cole
736 So. 2d 802 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Eulo v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEAL COM'N
724 So. 2d 636 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Brainard v. Willa Merriott Realty, Inc.
716 So. 2d 801 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Grossman v. Jewish Community Center
704 So. 2d 714 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Dempsey v. Old Dominion Freight Lines
645 So. 2d 538 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
630 So. 2d 1166, 1993 WL 538194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gollet-enter-east-inc-v-fla-unemp-app-commission-fladistctapp-1993.