Gollel v. Nassar

214 A.D.2d 1039, 627 N.Y.S.2d 599, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6841
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gollel v. Nassar. Read the opinion of the Court — 206 A.D.2d 835

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs and motion denied. Memorandum: Supreme Court lacked jurisdiction to grant plaintiffs’ motion to resettle and amend the July 19, 1994 judgment entered pursuant to a decision and order of this Court in Gollel v Nassar (206 AD2d 835, lv denied 85 NY2d 802) granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing the complaint (see, Herpe v Herpe, 225 NY 323, 327; see also, Aurnou v Greenspan, 182 AD2d 523, lv dismissed 80 NY2d 866). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Ark, J.—Amend Judgment.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Fallon, Doerr and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gollel v. Nassar, 214 A.D.2d 1039, 627 N.Y.S.2d 599, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6841 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

214 A.D.2d 1039 (Gollel v. Nassar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Herpe v. . Herpe
122 N.E. 204 (New York Court of Appeals, 1919)
Aurnou v. Greenspan
182 A.D.2d 523 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Gollel v. Nassar
206 A.D.2d 835 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)