Gollel v. Nassar
Opinion
Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs and motion denied. Memorandum: Supreme Court lacked jurisdiction to grant plaintiffs’ motion to resettle and amend the July 19, 1994 judgment entered pursuant to a decision and order of this Court in Gollel v Nassar (206 AD2d 835, lv denied 85 NY2d 802) granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing the complaint (see, Herpe v Herpe, 225 NY 323, 327; see also, Aurnou v Greenspan, 182 AD2d 523, lv dismissed 80 NY2d 866). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Ark, J.—Amend Judgment.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Fallon, Doerr and Balio, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
214 A.D.2d 1039 (Gollel v. Nassar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.