Home/New York Court of Appeals/Gollel v. Nassar

Gollel v. Nassar

656 N.E.2d 595, 86 N.Y.2d 811, 632 N.Y.S.2d 497, 1995 N.Y. LEXIS 3498
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 14, 1995
StatusPublished

This text of 656 N.E.2d 595 (Gollel v. Nassar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gollel v. Nassar, 656 N.E.2d 595, 86 N.Y.2d 811, 632 N.Y.S.2d 497, 1995 N.Y. LEXIS 3498 (N.Y. 1995).

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the April 28, 1995 Appellate Division order, dismissed upon the ground that that order does not finally determine the action within [812]*812the meaning of the Constitution; motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the July 15, 1994 Appellate Division order [206 AD2d 835], treated as a motion for reargument of appellants’ previous motion for leave to appeal from that order [see, 85 NY2d 802], dismissed as untimely. Cross motion for the imposition of sanctions denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gollel v. Nassar
206 A.D.2d 835 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
656 N.E.2d 595, 86 N.Y.2d 811, 632 N.Y.S.2d 497, 1995 N.Y. LEXIS 3498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gollel-v-nassar-ny-1995.